Arab democracy is different
Tuesday, October 25th, 2011Foreign news channels watched on Sunday. Long shown that the new leaders of Libya, Gaddafi's regime declared their country to be exempted. Before it was shown bloody ainuvalitsejat, who was a jerk, and finally by the men was lying stiffly, and his corpse in a morgue to see the men had formed a queue. I saw no women, but were divided marlimaske. Also went to the former ruler of the remains active recording cameras and phones.
There were also elections in Tunisia on Sunday, 9 months after the overthrow of the President. I looked in the queue of people wanting to choose and how to finger dipped in paint.
As a dyed finger after I remembered the occupation of Iraq after the elections, which tarnished the same color of people's fingers with ink, or that they will not be re-vote. Particularly absurd was the presence of such persons with fingers or the U.S. Congress, Senate leader, George Walker Bush, had one of his speech. Of course this was before the people the opportunity to dip your finger into the color in that both express support for Bush's policies.
It also reminded me of Afghanistan painted finger phenomenon. The voter shall mark in such a way seems to be happening in all the Arab countries, has recently released. Probably do not trust the local authorities or reporting on the people of the observers did not understand the Arabic language, or the letter pandut. So is the simplest but one of choice for the labeling of all people. I did not participate until 1996. until the elections but I do not recall that we have the habit of human fingers were stained. Obviously, our record keeping more accurate.
On this occasion, I saw freedom in Libya, via the BBC just sit on the stage in front of their men, and said to call a man. Also, the square had accumulated thousands of listeners exclusively by men. While television station showed video clips from earlier rõõmustamistest people but also there were clearly separated from the men and women / adolescents. I have not seen any television with weapons täristavate men's side, or even close to pleasing a woman (albeit covered with hair and face). It is a fact that we have not emphasized in particular that the party there because society (women) are not involved in processes.
That is my opinion that, from a Western notion of democracy, we do not talk about the harvest. They have no social equality or freedom, which are prerequisites for the emergence of democracy. In fact, it is not very well expect them to, at least as long as the oil and gas contracts will go to the right companies.
If the center were signing contracts with new politicians, overthrowing the former ruler of the western countries and helped tend to be too erratic behavior, they can safely carry out the interests of his clan.
I watched it a television Benghazist Libya and saw that there already exists the new beginnings of military dictatorships. There were 2 white armchair on stage, in which the men sat down to probably more important, by congratulating you and some others went patsutamas shoulder.
Remote call is made for the background white armchairs. The rest of the coup-makers were sitting in the stage.
I started thinking, what a feeling that the image seen it work with other countries in the Arab cultural area, who are not yet dropped (eg Syria), but the people who are also rahololematu. Although their skin would not want to be because of NATO's military capacity was used in one country and overthrow the ruler of the puppet government of the appointment. It also seems suspicious in any way release the ceremony, because how can this be mentioned in the uprising or a coup. If we take over the British terminology, you could continue to get any political power in a violent change of name to "release" and not far into the habit of rebellion, revolution, invasion or overthrow the government. In this case was significant for the intervention of foreign forces, arms shipments to the retaliation and the fact that NATO has led his troops landing on earth, yet it does not make the people, carried out by the coup. The U.S. has for decades supplied the back country itself with unpleasant opponents weapons and know-how to organize a coup of their hands.
No matter what you read in North Africa or the Middle East, making a more democratic, do not believe these allegations. In fact, this is propaganda to overshadow the debates around the oil wars. Mr Gaddafi was probably fatal to his own state's plan to start selling oil in dollars for gold. It would have been a disaster for the entire industrial world, hitherto, been paid for oil in paper money, that can always be printed, and the mere idea that oil can only be in exchange for gold, is worth a war (when viewed from Europe). Let us recall for example, the British held the Chinese Opium Wars. There was also the problem that the Chinese were interested only in silver, which they sold silk, tea, porcelain and other goods made by them and the Europeans were able to trade in any way balanced. So they brought in the Chinese opium-addicted and made, after which the silver was next to another item that they could use. Probably shaded it in the statements that we want free trade with the Chinese, and on all articles (drug addiction at that time probably was not considered a crime).







