In Finland, 75% of people aged 16 to select the admission
Thursday, February 18th, 2010Estonia was also actively discussed in this autumn of the current age of 18 and choose to apply for admission to limit the reduction to 16 years. The reason given young people a greater interest in the policy and have the opportunity to have a say in decisions.
Finland conducted a study on the topic and found that three quarters or 75 percent or even more of the respondents were against the proposal to give voting right to the beneficiary for 16 years.
Quote:
The conversion of Kalevala and viiden maakuntalehden teettämän kyselyn mukana Vain viidesosa let äänioikeusiän vuoteen 16 parliamentary and kunnallisvaaleissa. Are three of the four 16-antaisi äänioikeutta vuotiaille.
Myönteisimmin äänioikeusiän alentamiseen suhtautuvat nuorimmat, 15-24, vuotiaat. Heistäkin 70 prosenttia pitäisi kuitenkin ennallaan Rajan.
Taloustutkimus haastatteli kyselyyn noin 1000 henkilöä 2nd-9th helmikuuta. There are three Virhemarginaali prosenttiyksikköä suuntaan toiseen Thailand.
Translation could be the one that the newspaper Kaleva, and another 5 page order of the county were surveyed 1,000 people and of them only one fifth or 20 per cent of the sample would reduce life to 16 years in local and parliamentary elections. Three of the four people would not give it. Were welcomed most favorably to the 15 to 24 years of age, among whom 70 percent were against the proposal. Survey error is 3 percent in either direction.
I especially liked the one comment that 16 years is to have a larger turnout for the future of home rule, however, he still can not decide, even sleep time to discharge.
We also have the issue faded away. Apparently, I had another one of the intellectually interesting proposal to reform political parties. Or were behind the IRL's youth, do not even remember anymore because the government issues both parties are actively engaged in the replacement, the entire force is going to whistle.






